SUMMARY: Non-deterministic behaviour on Ultra SPARC

2007-12-24 20:19:00

Hi,

I got only one reply (which asked if e.g. /var was full, which was not the case)
to my question (the original question is attached below).

In the end with the help of our hardware dealer I succeeded to contact someone at
SUN.
He advised to apply some patches:

106625-11
106292-11
105786-14
105516-06
105529-11
105580-17
105379-06
106439-07
106842-09
106841-01

After that the problem vanished :-)
Although some of the above patches obviously are not related to our problem
(e.g. the pkgadd patch) at least one seemed to correct a real problem.
My personal favorite is the glm driver patch (105580-17).

Cheers,

Andreas

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SunOS cavallo 5.6 Generic_105181-26 sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi-Engine
>
> which shows a reproducible non-deterministic behaviour.
> We first observed it as "corrupted blocks" in an oracle database and nailed
> it down to the following:
> Under load simple reading of big files (i.e. 100 MB and larger) gives
> diefferent results each time the file is read.
> If the load goes down - reading is OK.
> (We tested it with many parrallel md5sum's which pushed the load above 10).
> No entries in syslog or dmesg :-)
> The behaviour is not bound to a specific disk or controller.
>
> prtdiag -v says:
>
> System Configuration: Sun Microsystems sun4u SPARCengine(tm)Ultra(tm) AXi (UltraSPARC-IIi 360MHz)
> System clock frequency: 90 MHz
> Memory size: 1024 Megabytes
>
> ========================= CPUs =========================
>
> Run Ecache CPU CPU
> Brd CPU Module MHz MB Impl. Mask
> --- --- ------- ----- ------ ------ ----
> 0 0 0 360 0.2 12 9.1
>
> ========================= IO Cards =========================
>
> No failures found in System
> ===========================
>
> ========================= HW Revisions =========================
>
> ASIC Revisions:
> ---------------
>
> System PROM revisions:
> ----------------------
>
> Anybody with any ideas? Do we have a defect CPU or Cache,
>
> TIA
>
> Andreas

Comments

Got something to say?

You must be logged in to post a comment.