SUMMARY: Patch for "Buffer Overflow in DNS Resolver Libraries"

2007-12-24 23:14:00

Apologies for the late summary, but I have been trying to avoid
admitting publicly that I'm an idiot. :-) I had an anti-spam filter
that, among other things, /dev/null-ed e-mail to my codeprof
mailbox that wasn't from codeprof at codeprof.com. So, I probably
got some replies before I realized this and fixed it, but I never saw
them.

One of my coworkers did open a case with Sun. Supposedly, Solaris is
vulnerable and they are working on a patch. The bugid he gave me is
4708913 (one of the ones I found). Personally, I'm still skeptical
since SunSolve says that the bugid is closed.

That's all I know. Sorry for the lame summary.

--
Mike

>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Fuller <codeprof at mikeandanna.net> writes:

> CERT Advisory CA-2002-19 "Buffer Overflow in Multiple DNS Resolver
> Libraries":

> http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-19.html

> claims that Solaris is vulnerable; however, I have been unable to
> locate an open bugid to track on SunSolve. There are two (4708913
> and 4710816), but both are closed and have no Patch ID associated
> with them. The only recent patch of libresolv.so I've seen is:

> http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/findPatch.pl?patchId=109326&rev=08

> which does not claim to address this bug and predates the
> announcement by 3 days.

> What's weirder is that I have neither seen mention of it here nor
> seen the usual amount of discussion in Bugtraq, so I have no idea if
> I'm really vulnerable. So, is Solaris vulnerable? And if so, has
> anybody heard what Sun's plans are for a patch?

> BTW, I suppose the correct thing to do in this situation is to just
> open up a case with Sun, but since this should be of general
> interest, I'm asking here. Respond to me and I'll summarize.

Comments

Got something to say?

You must be logged in to post a comment.