user/group named
2007-12-24 22:58:00
-- Most Solaris system I've seen, named just runs/owns by root.
-- Most Linux (ie. Redhat) I've seen, named runs/owns by named
(user and group) --only /var/named and everything below owns
by named (user and group).
My question is, does it matter if named is own by root or named? I can see
why Redhat/Linux is set so there's a user named and group named for another
layer of security, but how big of a deal if named is run/own by root? or is
this just "matter of preference"?
Thanks.
- Mike
Comments
Got something to say?
You must be logged in to post a comment.
