Performence of Sparc2/Weitec

2007-12-25 8:42:00

Hi,

Original question:

> Hi people,

> In the process of evaluating the performence boost due to the installation of

> Weitec's SPARC POWER uP, I observed the following. I ran a tiny c program

> which goes through a loop of floating point multiplications.

> I got the following results:

>

> Sparc2 Sparc2+Weitec Sparc10/41 Sparc10/51

> ------- ------------- ---------- ----------

> 26.7 10.2 10.1 8.1

>

> Compiling with 'cc -O' resulted in these results:

> 16.3 8.0 7.7 6.0

>

> These are results (for user time) reported by '/usr/bin/time' when running the

> following program:

>

> main()

> {

> register int i;

> register double c = 1.0;

>

> for (i=1; i< 100000000; i++)

> c=c*1.000005;

>

> }

>

> Sun rates these machines as follows:

> Sparc2 Sparc2+Weitec Sparc10/41 Sparc10/51

> ------- ------------- ---------- ----------

> MFLOPS 4.2 (?) 17.2 21 (?)

> SPECfp 22.8 31 67.8 83.0

>

> Finally comes my question:

> How come the difference between the Weitec and Sparc10/41 and Sparc10/51

> are so minute ? (will summarize)

Basically the concensus was that such benchmarks are quite meaningless and

that application specific benchmarks should be run.

Thanks to:

don@mars.dgrc.doc.ca

Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk

casper@fwi.uva.nl

jon@alpha.ee.ufl.edu

eckhard@ts.go.dlr.de

Craig.Warner@Ceram.COM

lct@ai.mit.edu

jdd@db.toronto.edu

szh@zcon.com

peter@jrc.nl

stern@sunrise.East.Sun.COM


--
==========================================================================
|| Eli Lopez, Computer Center Manager, National Semiconductor, Israel ||
\\ Phone: 972-9-594-236, Fax: 972-9-558-322 //
====================================================================

Comments

Got something to say?

You must be logged in to post a comment.